01
Traffic Stop
Law enforcement stopped the client and reported signs of impairment.
Case Study · Northern Wisconsin
Both DismissedOWI and Refusal
A first-offense OWI and refusal matter involving a Northern Wisconsin business owner ended with both allegations dismissed before trial.
Case Snapshot
The Essential Facts
A concise overview of the allegation, court, representation, and central result. These are facts—not links or navigation cards.
AllegationsOWI + Refusal
Prior RecordNo Prior OWI
RegionNorthern Wisconsin
Legal TeamDineen + Skarie
The client was a Northern Wisconsin business owner who was stopped on suspicion of operating while intoxicated while attempting to help a friend.
The client refused the preliminary breath test and faced an OWI allegation together with a refusal matter.
The defense reviewed the initial stop, officer observations, standardized field tests, available footage, refusal procedure, and Wisconsin law before entering focused negotiations.
Why the Multi-Layered Review Mattered
Weaknesses that appear minor in isolation can become significant when the complete investigation is tested against the legal burden.
Case Timeline
How the Matter Developed
The sequence matters because each stage carries its own evidentiary and legal requirements.
02
Field Testing
HGN, walk-and-turn, and one-leg-stand tests were administered.
03
Evidence Review
The legal team examined the testing conditions, officer conduct, inconsistencies, and available video.
04
Refusal Analysis
The warnings, request, response, and applicable refusal procedure were reviewed separately.
05
Resolution
Both the OWI allegation and the refusal matter were dismissed before trial.
Evidence Review
What Mattered Most
The defense focused on the evidence capable of changing how the allegation was understood.
01
Officer Interactions
Every contact between the client and law enforcement was reviewed for inconsistencies and procedural issues.
02
Testing Conditions
Surface, lighting, instructions, scoring, and client-specific limitations were evaluated.
03
Video and Legal Research
The available footage was compared with the reports and the applicable Wisconsin law.
Defense Strategy
Combine the Evidentiary and Procedural Weaknesses
The defense used the complete case review to support negotiation rather than depending on one contested observation.
- Review the legal basis for the traffic stop
- Test every reported field-sobriety clue
- Compare police descriptions with available video
- Evaluate the refusal warnings and procedure separately
- Use the complete record in focused pretrial negotiation
Final Outcome
OWI and Refusal Dismissed Before Trial
The legal team used the evidentiary and procedural review to obtain dismissal of both matters approximately four months after the arrest.
- First-offense OWI dismissed
- Refusal matter dismissed
- No trial required
- Resolution reached in approximately four months
Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts, evidence, court, prosecutor, prior record, and applicable law.
Case
Insight
Insight
“The result came from treating the case as a sequence of separate legal and evidentiary decisions—not as one police narrative.”
Case study takeaway
Questions This Case Raises
Legal Context
These answers are general. The correct analysis depends on the facts, notices, evidence, and procedural history of the individual matter.
No. Wisconsin distinguishes among types of testing and procedures. The specific request and notice must be reviewed.
Yes. They can involve separate procedures, issues, deadlines, and consequences.
Surface, lighting, footwear, traffic, instructions, medical limitations, and scoring can affect reliability.
Yes. Evidentiary, legal, and procedural weaknesses can affect motions and pretrial resolution.
More Results
Related OWI Case Studies
Talk With a Wisconsin OWI Defense Attorney
Let’s Review
Your Case
Share the basic facts about the stop, testing, prior record, court date, and any license or refusal notices.